← ggrigo.xyz

Furniture design with Fable · one notebook photo in

Kostas’s kitchen

A photo of a ballpoint kitchen sketch went in. Out came a measured drawing set, a redline punch list for the carpenter, and eight decisions for Kostas — every finding stress-tested by agents instructed to kill it.

The brief asked for collusion detection: no cabinets are colluding. Six collide.

inputone photo of a notebook page
transcribeevery mark, crossed-out words kept
drawthree sheets at 1:25
audit51 agents · 44 findings · 11 killed
deliverdrawings · punch list · decisions

The sketch, as read

the input

Everything below works from this reading — if a line here misreads the page, the fix starts here.

The drawing set

for the carpenter · 1:25 · cm

Solid is what the sketch commits to; pencil-dash is a decision still open; rose tags key to the punch list and decisions below.

tall unit fridge? cutlery garbage sink dishwasher plates — drip rack (πιατοθήκη) cups, glasses C-02 C-05 D-3 D-6 60 80 60 40 240 60?
Sheet 01 — Elevation · wash run
scale 1:25
from the sketch, top of page
hood? — not in sketch hob? — not in sketch cutlery · pots · pans utensils shallow cupboard boiler + toaster ✓ C-01 C-04 C-03 D-7 40 80 40 160 ?
Sheet 02 — Elevation · prep run
scale 1:25
from the sketch, middle of page
if 80 → pantry appliances not in use (+ one word, crossed out, illegible) D-4 100 or 80
Sheet 03 — Elevation · tall pantry
scale 1:25
width marked “80 or 100”

The question the sketch never answers

plan · not to scale

The page never says how the two runs sit in the room — and every clearance check hangs on it. This is decision D-1.

D-1 · ≥120? run 1 run 2

Galley. Best fit for two runs of this length — if the aisle clears 120 cm with the dishwasher door down.

C-06 corner run 1 run 2

L-shape. Possible — but the corner eats a cabinet and needs a filler; the sketch allocates neither.

run 1 + run 2 + pantry

Single wall. Needs ~6.6 m of unbroken wall. If Kostas had that wall, he’d probably have drawn it.

Redline punch list

for the carpenter · confirmed

Six conflicts survived adversarial review. The tags sit on the sheets above.

before any orderA measured survey — walls ±0.5 cm, window axis, ceiling at three points — and a one-page services drawing: dishwasher socket in the sink base, two doubles over run 2 split across 16 A circuits, everything on 30 mA RCD, dedicated hob line. Rough-in finished before the cabinets arrive.

Eight decisions for Kostas

for the owner

Each comes with a default — saying “fine” eight times closes the design.

Worth doing while it’s still ink

no new questions

How it was made

method

The photo was transcribed verbatim — crossed-out words included — and redrawn at 1:25 on EU 60 cm modules. Five design lenses (geometry, ergonomics, services, storage, unknowns) plus a completeness critic raised 44 findings; every one went to an adversarial reviewer instructed to refute it. 11 died there — among them “the bin fights the P-trap” (a bin in the sink base is the EU default), “the drip rack rains on the worktop” (it critiqued a proposed fix, not the sketch), and “the dishwasher is on the wrong side” (its own recommendation was keep it as drawn).

The first run audited nothing at all: a plumbing bug fed the agents an empty spec, and they refused to invent a kitchen. 51 agents, 18 minutes — and the only questions left are the ones that were always Kostas’s.